Page 1 of 1

June 4, 2014

Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 10:19 pm
by Commish Bub(NYR)
STL 2 - PIT 1
Shots: 35-12 PIT
PP: STL - 1/1; PIT - 0/5

14:59 0-1 PIT Joey Hishon [4] (Paul Dejersey, Tyler Pitlick)
------------------------------------------------------------
no scoring
------------------------------------------------------------
49:28 1-1 STL Martin St. Louis [14] (John McFarland, Dmitry Kulikov)PP
58:52 2-1 STL Lars Eller [5] (John McFarland)
------------------------------------------------------------

Three stars:
1st star: Martin St. Louis
2nd star: John McFarland
3rd star: Lars Eller

Pittsburgh leads Stanley Cup Finals 2-1

Re: June 4, 2014

Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 10:21 pm
by Commish Bub(NYR)
The Pens dominate every stat except the one that counts. Kari Lehtonen somehow doesn't earn first star, or any star.

Game 4 Friday night!

http://www.ehechockey.com/EHEC.zip

http://www.ehechockey.com/calendar.html

Re: June 4, 2014

Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2014 11:44 pm
by Montreal Canadiens
Woooooooooooooooooooo!

Re: June 4, 2014

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 12:12 am
by SharksGM
Keep calm and Corsi's wrong, eh?

Re: June 4, 2014

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 7:11 am
by Singin the BLUES
Exactly what the Blues needed. Damn good game. Dont think i have ever seen a winning team have players get that low of ratings on a big Cup final win.......but oh well a win is a win. Still gotta get more of the young guys going and Lehtonen without a star of the game is insane. He will be first star NEXT game :)

Re: June 4, 2014

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 6:04 pm
by Penguin
35-12 shots, come on boys go top cheese or something... :(

Btw Brad, you raped a whole bunch of GMs and I lost on many trades (ex: what I gave for Dan Boyle to SJ), you're a big sore loser! Jensen was a bad trade? Morin, Elsner and a 1st!? Yayaa.

Re: June 4, 2014

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 8:20 pm
by Montreal Canadiens
Penguin wrote:35-12 shots, come on boys go top cheese or something... :(

Btw Brad, you raped a whole bunch of GMs and I lost on many trades (ex: what I gave for Dan Boyle to SJ), you're a big sore loser! Jensen was a bad trade? Morin, Elsner and a 1st!? Yayaa.
I have NOT raped a male....ever.....

Jokes aside. Never have really done the damage of the Pens. No JVR deals here, or Jensen deals. Elsner has been a EHEC hooker.

Re: June 4, 2014

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 8:39 pm
by Bruins_GM
The Nick Jensen trade was shitty for me, only because he's not in a Bruins uniform.

Re: June 4, 2014

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 9:52 pm
by SharksGM
The Jensen trade was shitty for me, because it inspired this terrible posting.

Re: June 4, 2014

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 10:06 pm
by Montreal Canadiens
It was also shitty for VAN and VAN;s future and looks bad on the league as a whole.

Re: June 4, 2014

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 10:13 pm
by Singin the BLUES
Ok i dont think non playoff teams should be arguing about non playoff shit in here thank you very much.

Re: June 4, 2014

Posted: Thu Jun 05, 2014 11:49 pm
by VancouverCanucksGM
Montreal Canadiens wrote:It was also shitty for VAN and VAN;s future and looks bad on the league as a whole.

But not the dick whining, crying, bitching, and complaining about anything and everything to why his team didn't win some games in the regular season, some games in the playoffs, and of course, couldn't win the only game that mattered this season....like last season.

Just concentrate on getting the Hab-nots over that last hump that your "championship" team can't seem to get over.

Re: June 4, 2014

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 1:57 am
by Montreal Canadiens
You go around in all these threads posting random drunk bullshit that has no meaning whatsoever (considering it's all false - what fucking complaining are you dreaming up?) and coming from the LAST PLACE TEAM to boot.

I'll take a playoff spot any day over last place in the league. I'm sure the 15 other people that enjoyed the P-L-A-Y-O-F-F-S would say that as well.

Talk to me when you can win more than a handful of games.

Sucks Phoenix, Calgary, Tampa, San Jose, Columbus, Anaheim, LA, Winnipeg, Carolina, New Jersey, Washington, Chicago, and Boston are all crappy teams and couldn't win any games that mattered either and we're all irrelevant except the big bad last place team.

Do you have EHM? Would make sense if you didn't. I'm not sure if you saw the standings at all.

Re: June 4, 2014

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 1:58 am
by Montreal Canadiens
Singin the BLUES wrote:Ok i dont think non playoff teams should be arguing about non playoff shit in here thank you very much.
Just shush and go win some more games.

Re: June 4, 2014

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 6:35 am
by VancouverCanucksGM
Montreal Canadiens wrote:You go around in all these threads posting random drunk bullshit that has no meaning whatsoever (considering it's all false - what fucking complaining are you dreaming up?) and coming from the LAST PLACE TEAM to boot.
Check the Cup score. Seems we're still deadlocked. False? Yeah, i'm sure it is. i don't have the time or the patience to go through and post all the different reasons you've given for why your team didn't win.

Maybe I wouldn't keep showing up in these threads, if you'd keep my team out of your mouth.
I'll take a playoff spot any day over last place in the league. I'm sure the 15 other people that enjoyed the P-L-A-Y-O-F-F-S would say that as well.
I'm sure they did, and I congratulate all of those 15. You are apparently this leagues San Jose Sharks.
Talk to me when you can win more than a handful of games.
Like I said, as long as 2 of those handful are against you, I'm fine. If you actually win something, maybe then I'll concede, but until then, the only difference between us, is your season lasted 14 games longer.
Sucks Phoenix, Calgary, Tampa, San Jose, Columbus, Anaheim, LA, Winnipeg, Carolina, New Jersey, Washington, Chicago, and Boston are all crappy teams and couldn't win any games that mattered either and we're all irrelevant except the big bad last place team.
No, just yours. None of THEM bitched or made excuses and blamed the system for their loses.
Do you have EHM? Would make sense if you didn't. I'm not sure if you saw the standings at all.
Of course I saw the standings.

I'm rebuilding, you're not, seems like a good reason for their being a difference. You do know what rebuilding is right? And just because I don't do it the way BRADLEY would, doesn't mean I might not get better. Of course if I don't, maybe I'll start blaming the simmer's or other teams lines, or that other teams are getting too many good players in trades and the committee is doing nothing to prevent it.

You're a GM, that in a previous league, once traded away his 1st, 2nd, and 3rd round picks FOR THREE YEARS, just to barely be a few games over .500 and miss the playoffs. It seems not much has changed other than the record. Maybe in another 10 years you might finally win a Cup. Not holding my breath though.

Re: June 4, 2014

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 1:08 pm
by Montreal Canadiens
You're a GM, that in a previous league, once traded away his 1st, 2nd, and 3rd round picks FOR THREE YEARS, just to barely be a few games over .500 and miss the playoffs. It seems not much has changed other than the record. Maybe in another 10 years you might finally win a Cup. Not holding my breath though
....what the fuck are you talking about?

You keep your head up in the basement. Enjoy it. I'll wave from the top of the league standings.

Re: June 4, 2014

Posted: Fri Jun 06, 2014 5:14 pm
by Virtual Jarmo
The league will have a response on all of this in the coming days. I'm working on getting together with Tim and Pat to discuss this and other league issues in real-time, including the discussion in the League Memos forum.

I appreciate your patience as we look to get everything together for next season and search for ways to continue to improve the league.