December 17, 2014
Moderator: SharksGM
- Commish Bub(NYR)
- Posts: 6507
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 11:30 am
- Location: Maine
December 17, 2014
Results here: http://www.ehechockey.com/schedule.php
Standings here: http://www.ehechockey.com/standings.php
League leaders here: http://www.ehechockey.com/leagueleaders.php
League file here: http://www.ehechockey.com/ehec.zip
Short schedule tonight: New Jersey tackles Ottawa at home, 4-1; Minnesota comes back to tie it late in the game, and then takes the shootout; Dallas mistreats the Canucks on the road.
Standings here: http://www.ehechockey.com/standings.php
League leaders here: http://www.ehechockey.com/leagueleaders.php
League file here: http://www.ehechockey.com/ehec.zip
Short schedule tonight: New Jersey tackles Ottawa at home, 4-1; Minnesota comes back to tie it late in the game, and then takes the shootout; Dallas mistreats the Canucks on the road.
- Vik (Habs)
- Posts: 2788
- Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 12:46 pm
Re: December 17, 2014
Just noticed Scott Hannan's contract is for less than what's allowed (didn't sit out a full season so max should've been $1.5M * .75 = $1.125M).
Edit: It also seems to have a TO on it. I'm guessing he was released through the file rather than the game so that didn't get reset.
Edit: It also seems to have a TO on it. I'm guessing he was released through the file rather than the game so that didn't get reset.
- Commish Bub(NYR)
- Posts: 6507
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 11:30 am
- Location: Maine
Re: December 17, 2014
Thanks for catching that -- I'll adjust his salary and take away his TO. There are still a lot of them floating around out there.Vik (Habs) wrote:Just noticed Scott Hannan's contract is for less than what's allowed (didn't sit out a full season so max should've been $1.5M * .75 = $1.125M).
Edit: It also seems to have a TO on it. I'm guessing he was released through the file rather than the game so that didn't get reset.
- Vik (Habs)
- Posts: 2788
- Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 12:46 pm
Re: December 17, 2014
Just remember it's the one in the stats file that you gotta change, not the players file (he's player ID 604).Commish Bub(NYR) wrote:Thanks for catching that -- I'll adjust his salary and take away his TO. There are still a lot of them floating around out there.
Also, I made a list of everyone in the game with a TO. No one stuck out to me as a signed player that shouldn't have one but I haven't been around long enough to know for sure. I can send someone the list if they want to check it over (there are 191 of them). Also, if you like, I can probably whip something up to remove them from the 98 UFAs that are currently sporting one (unless someone wants to volunteer to do it manually ... where'd everybody go?).
- Dallas Stars GM
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 10:47 am
- Location: Slovakia
Re: December 17, 2014
Enroth's finally proving that he's a good goalie
- Commish Bub(NYR)
- Posts: 6507
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 11:30 am
- Location: Maine
Re: December 17, 2014
No -- we're not removing existing TOs, since they were offered/accepted back when we still used them. It's really 2-way contracts that should go the way of the dodo.Vik (Habs) wrote:Just remember it's the one in the stats file that you gotta change, not the players file (he's player ID 604).Commish Bub(NYR) wrote:Thanks for catching that -- I'll adjust his salary and take away his TO. There are still a lot of them floating around out there.
Also, I made a list of everyone in the game with a TO. No one stuck out to me as a signed player that shouldn't have one but I haven't been around long enough to know for sure. I can send someone the list if they want to check it over (there are 191 of them). Also, if you like, I can probably whip something up to remove them from the 98 UFAs that are currently sporting one (unless someone wants to volunteer to do it manually ... where'd everybody go?).
- Vik (Habs)
- Posts: 2788
- Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 12:46 pm
Re: December 17, 2014
The existing ones I'm offering to remove are for players that are currently UFA (to avoid any other situations like Hannan).Commish Bub(NYR) wrote:No -- we're not removing existing TOs, since they were offered/accepted back when we still used them. It's really 2-way contracts that should go the way of the dodo.Vik (Habs) wrote:Just remember it's the one in the stats file that you gotta change, not the players file (he's player ID 604).Commish Bub(NYR) wrote:Thanks for catching that -- I'll adjust his salary and take away his TO. There are still a lot of them floating around out there.
Also, I made a list of everyone in the game with a TO. No one stuck out to me as a signed player that shouldn't have one but I haven't been around long enough to know for sure. I can send someone the list if they want to check it over (there are 191 of them). Also, if you like, I can probably whip something up to remove them from the 98 UFAs that are currently sporting one (unless someone wants to volunteer to do it manually ... where'd everybody go?).
-
Calgary.Flames
Re: December 17, 2014
Are you like a couple clicks away if you want to get rid of the Two-ways too?
- Vik (Habs)
- Posts: 2788
- Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2014 12:46 pm
Re: December 17, 2014
I could probably get rid of all two-ways but is there any need? Doesn't really hurt anything to leave them.Calgary.Flames wrote:Are you like a couple clicks away if you want to get rid of the Two-ways too?
- Commish Bub(NYR)
- Posts: 6507
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 11:30 am
- Location: Maine
Re: December 17, 2014
Okay, I'll release him then.Penguin wrote:Please remove Hannan, I can't afford him at that price.
- Commish Bub(NYR)
- Posts: 6507
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 11:30 am
- Location: Maine
Re: December 17, 2014
Meh. I could go either way. We all know they're not used now, so no need to spend your time removing them.Vik (Habs) wrote:I could probably get rid of all two-ways but is there any need? Doesn't really hurt anything to leave them.Calgary.Flames wrote:Are you like a couple clicks away if you want to get rid of the Two-ways too?